{"id":1515,"date":"2013-04-17T13:01:18","date_gmt":"2013-04-17T20:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/?p=1515"},"modified":"2013-04-17T13:01:18","modified_gmt":"2013-04-17T20:01:18","slug":"digital-humanities-and-the-allure-of-the-absurd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/digital-humanities-and-the-allure-of-the-absurd\/","title":{"rendered":"Digital humanities and the allure of the absurd"},"content":{"rendered":"

Over at MediaCommons, I contributed an answer<\/a>\u00a0to a survey on the intersections of digital humanities and media studies. I’m reposting it here:<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Multiple<\/a>
CC BY NC ND-licensed photo “stones 2” by Flickr user speedoflight_speedoflight. Source<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It is, of course, absurd to claim you can capture the richness of human experience in machine-readable data. Human lives are quicksilver, protean, bent and pulled in a thousand different directions. We think and feel, interpret and surmise, hold contradictory notions, revel in paradox. It\u2019s ridiculous to think that a machine, which thinks in binary, can replicate these shades of\u00a0gray.<\/p>\n

And yet. Media scholars know better than anyone that it is equally absurd to attempt to capture human experience in a photographic narrative. Because we understand the photographic image \u2014 its trickery, its inherent limitations, the world beyond its frame \u2014 we understand how essentially false is any work\u2019s claim to represent \u201creality\u201d in all its plenitude and contingency. To argue that a work of media is fully representative is to be unforgivably na\u00efve; we know that every work is constructed, no matter how transparent it\u00a0appears.<\/p>\n

But somehow we feel there\u2019s something valiant in the attempt to capture human experience, even in these inadequate media. Writing on Rossellini\u2019s\u00a0Pais\u00e0<\/em>, Andre Bazin observed that the film\u2019s essential unit is not the shot but the \u201cfact,\u201d one slice of time and space, itself worthy of interpretation and filled with meaning.\u00a0Pais\u00e0<\/em>\u00a0is rife with gaps and omissions, but so much the better: \u201cThe mind has to leap from one event to the other as one leaps from stone to stone in crossing the river.\u201d The best films are beautiful not because they claim earnestly to represent reality, but because they acknowledge this feat\u2019s impossibility butkeep trying anyway<\/em>, honoring their viewers by trusting them to make their way from stone to stone.1<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a potential for a digital humanities that holds toward data the same vexed, impossible loyalty with which media scholars honor the photographic image. In this version of digital humanities, scholars would view data neither as fully adequate to reality nor as necessarily mendacious, but as one moment, a slice of time and space. The best work would not be the most comprehensive \u2014 just as the best films are not the most verismilitudinous \u2014 but that which exhibits the most sophistication, the most humanity, in making the leap from fact to\u00a0narrative.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think digital humanities is there yet, but I think this is an opportunity for media scholars. This is why I think the best possibilities for the intersection of digital humanities and media studies lie not so much in counting frames or automating facial recognition (though this is interesting in its way) as by bringing to digital humanities the peculiar agony of the media scholar: the belief, simultaneously, that all stories are lies and that there\u2019s truth in their\u00a0telling.<\/p>\n

1 Andr\u00e9 Bazin, \u201cAn Aesthetic of Reality: Cinematic Realism and the Italian School of Liberation,\u201d in\u00a0What Is Cinema? Volume 2<\/em>, Andr\u00e9 Bazin (Berkeley\/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 16-40), 35 and\u00a037.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Over at MediaCommons, I contributed an answer\u00a0to a survey on the intersections of digital humanities and media studies. I’m reposting it here: It is, of course, absurd to claim you can capture the richness of human experience in machine-readable data. Human lives are quicksilver, protean, bent and pulled in a thousand different directions. We think […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-humanities"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1515"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1518,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1515\/revisions\/1518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miriamposner.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}